The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System: Check last post for updates
- Thread starter Water Pokémon Master
- Start date
- Status
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
Oh...
BTW what does this have to do with spelling/grammar?
Oh...
BTW what does this have to do with spelling/grammar?
It seems more like flaming me. -_-My reputation said:
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
I have a question.
Is my style of posting a reason to get negative Ranking?
I don't think it should be... It doesn't affect my grammer, spelling, punctuation, etc...
Like. At all.
Just wondering. If it is, please, someone let me know. I don't want more negatives for using a unique posting style.
>.>
-Mart~
Is my style of posting a reason to get negative Ranking?
I don't think it should be... It doesn't affect my grammer, spelling, punctuation, etc...
Like. At all.
Just wondering. If it is, please, someone let me know. I don't want more negatives for using a unique posting style.
>.>
-Mart~
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
It's a little hard to read, but it isn't worth a negative. If some thinks you have fine spelling and grammar but thinks your style is hard to read, they can give you a positive rep and say...
Martainia, you have fine spelling and grammar but you should change your style. It's too hard to read.
That wouldn't be a problem at all.
It's a little hard to read, but it isn't worth a negative. If some thinks you have fine spelling and grammar but thinks your style is hard to read, they can give you a positive rep and say...
Martainia, you have fine spelling and grammar but you should change your style. It's too hard to read.
That wouldn't be a problem at all.
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
EDIT:: (This is the one I'm upset about.)
el Põkedad (0) - Last updated Today, 08:36 AM
Negative (-1): Whats with the center justification, it's just annoying.
zyflair said:
But it'sh sho shnazzy.... D:
I'm perfectcly willing to change it if I start getting "downgraded".
Really isn't worth the work to make my posts appealing if the opposite's going to occur.
-Mart~
I'm perfectcly willing to change it if I start getting "downgraded".
Really isn't worth the work to make my posts appealing if the opposite's going to occur.
-Mart~
EDIT:: (This is the one I'm upset about.)
el Põkedad (0) - Last updated Today, 08:36 AM
Negative (-1): Whats with the center justification, it's just annoying.
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
It is hard to read, but yeah, a negative is too harsh for a system that is for the member's spelling and grammar. Style has nothing to do with either of those two factors.
It is hard to read, but yeah, a negative is too harsh for a system that is for the member's spelling and grammar. Style has nothing to do with either of those two factors.
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
I don't mind Martainia's writing's size and colour at all!
But if people complain- can just green work for you Mart? =O Maybe a fancy font?
I don't mind Martainia's writing's size and colour at all!
But if people complain- can just green work for you Mart? =O Maybe a fancy font?
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
Stop insulting, pokemonred.
If his spelling is bad, let him know and refer him to one of the spelling and grammar threads by Max Shade IV instead of promoting something negative to happen to him.
darkrai1246 said:
Stop insulting, pokemonred.
If his spelling is bad, let him know and refer him to one of the spelling and grammar threads by Max Shade IV instead of promoting something negative to happen to him.
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
That's unfair.
Just because you choose to type in an original style is no reason to give you a negative.
Come to think of it...
I think you're the only person who changes the style of their text in all their posts.
That makes you unique! In a good way...
Martainia said:
That's unfair.
Just because you choose to type in an original style is no reason to give you a negative.
Come to think of it...
I think you're the only person who changes the style of their text in all their posts.
That makes you unique!
In a good way...RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
Question: Does slang like "wanna" or "aint" count as bad Spelling/Grammar?
Question: Does slang like "wanna" or "aint" count as bad Spelling/Grammar?
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
Kind of. I mean, why can't the person type out the full word
Kind of. I mean, why can't the person type out the full word
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
I'm not sure.
It isn't as bad as "liek" or "kewl" which are basically spam.
I mean those words seem fine to me. I really don't use them.
But I'm sure the mods know.
I'm not sure.
It isn't as bad as "liek" or "kewl" which are basically spam.
I mean those words seem fine to me. I really don't use them.
But I'm sure the mods know.
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
Slang is not considered good Grammar.
That is why slang is considered spam.
Yes it is, would an English professor use those words?darkrai1246 said:
Slang is not considered good Grammar.
That is why slang is considered spam.
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
If your talking about how I spell "jhoto" wrong;then your correct. Although,I spelled it wrong because I was proving to him that he is unfit to lead the clan.(Seeing as he can't spell one of the elements of the clan right.)
Phoenix said:
Sasarai said:Phoenix- In general, I see that you have good grammar. Alhough I did see a you, you're error in the post you told fire mew though
If your talking about how I spell "jhoto" wrong;then your correct. Although,I spelled it wrong because I was proving to him that he is unfit to lead the clan.(Seeing as he can't spell one of the elements of the clan right.)
RE: The New Spelling and Grammar Rankings System
i always give a neutral ranking for a single mistake. Negative rankings should only be for repeat offenders (great song by Trapt).
i always give a neutral ranking for a single mistake. Negative rankings should only be for repeat offenders (great song by Trapt).
- Status