"Boston Marathon attack was payback!"
- Thread starter debugs
- Start date
Personally I see where they're (saying they're) coming from, but the answer is not to bomb a marathon, needless to say. Fighting violence with violence does not work.
Is it odd that I have the thought of telling him 'You're not wrong?'
But yeah, a bomb never solves anything.
But yeah, a bomb never solves anything.
I'm getting a faulty newsvibe here.
So, while hiding inside a boat, a guy scribbles paragraphs of Muslim propaganda. Why? Who's supposed to read it?The suspect never, as far as I'm aware, told law enforcement anything of that sort. I suppose the writing would be fairly noticable, but it was first mentioned a month after the attack. I would hope the boat was searched thoroughly. Something is off here.
So, while hiding inside a boat, a guy scribbles paragraphs of Muslim propaganda. Why? Who's supposed to read it?The suspect never, as far as I'm aware, told law enforcement anything of that sort. I suppose the writing would be fairly noticable, but it was first mentioned a month after the attack. I would hope the boat was searched thoroughly. Something is off here.
Frost Mage said:
Tell that to literally everyone ever.
Lucky, Muslims were never blamed for 9/11. al-Qeada was.
Please, get it right.
Please, get it right.
Ok...
Wars are fought with violence. To win, you need violence. Someone has to lose/withdraw.
A bomb solved WWII. I think you may want to ask Japan about that one though.
Yes, al-Qaeda is a group of muslims.
Suitcune - try reading his post from a different angle. If i say, there is a group of kids involved, am i saying that all kids are involved, or just a specific group? See the difference?
Wars are fought with violence. To win, you need violence. Someone has to lose/withdraw.
A bomb solved WWII. I think you may want to ask Japan about that one though.
Yes, al-Qaeda is a group of muslims.
Suitcune - try reading his post from a different angle. If i say, there is a group of kids involved, am i saying that all kids are involved, or just a specific group? See the difference?
Well this is certainly an interesting perspective. These girls are fools. Watch the video it's very short.
No, a bomb didn't solve WW2. That's an incredibly inaccurate statement. The dropping of the atomic bombs was completely un-needed, and even the uranium club along with those who made the original atomic bomb generally agreed that these weapons should not be used, and they should be disarmed. The ONLY REASON we dropped the atomic bombs instead of invading was because it would have caused the death of more soldiers than needed. The Pacific theater was ending, and the push to the mainland was progressing even further. Japan was on the defensive, and we simply ended it. The bomb did not solve World War 2, in fact it could have been solved in many other ways. If Japanese soldiers were not so bent on never surrendering, World War 2 would have probably ended after the battle of Leyete Gulf, in fact by this time we were already doing Air Raids over Japan, Thailand, and Korea.
But on the actual subject, hundreds of thousand of innocent civilians were killed in a span of 5 years, and still are today through drone strikers. For every 1 terrorist that dies, 50 other civilians are killed as well.
But on the actual subject, hundreds of thousand of innocent civilians were killed in a span of 5 years, and still are today through drone strikers. For every 1 terrorist that dies, 50 other civilians are killed as well.