Aaaand here is my lead.
As I mentioned in the spoiler, entertaining the thought that Excal slipped is scummy, considering there was a highly plausible reason (Jesi's tag) for Excal's response. However, unlike when Camo does this, I don't think King X is trying to extract reactions. Rather, this looks like scum making sure they do not close any developing lynch options, so they can jump on the lynch at a later stage without being called out for bandwagoning. This evidence caused me to look into King X's posts in more detail, and then build a case.
I find it interesting that King X hasn't followed this up.
Potentially King X trying to gain inno credit because as scum he would've known that quaking was town. Some more evidence of this: [
A,
B]. The "potentially" is because this point is WIFOMy to an extent, so it is more minor evidence.
I find this funny, because from King X's posts
before the claim, it seemed like he was read quaking as townier, or
at least had a grasp on the quaking case. This sounds like scum backpedaling to me...
This comes across to me as King X latching onto easier pushes (Celever, Jesi), something that scum do a lot.
I do not like how King X is being general and pretending that he did not do this.
Very general again. Sticking up for your scumbuddies who were on the quaking lynch, King X?
tl;dr
King Xerneas is scummy because:
- Most notably, King X was entertaining the idea that Excal scumslipped
- Thus he makes sure he doesn't close the opportunity, so he can jump on the lynch at a later stage if he so wished.
- Not following-up on Jesi after quaking's flip, despite saying he would
- Trying to gain inno-cred from the quaking lynch despite solid evidence for the lynch
- Backpedalling
- Latching onto easy pushes
- Pretending they didn't "go after" Excal
- Potentially sticking up for scumbuddies
##VOTE: King Xerneas
