You just said that you can't compare Discord Werewolf to forum Mafia. Why are you comparing the two now? Also how can you make your defenses better through saying they're bad?
Finished Mafia XLV: Heroes of Askr ~ The Winner Is...
- Thread starter quakingpunch73
- Start date
- Status
Prove it.
Also @Neurowolf and @scattered mind you've both been lurking in this thread on and off throughout this conversation with rainy. Do you have anything to add?
No because I haven't done reading.
It was a stupid post :/. I mean they're right, I see now that we should vote first day. Well gg for my first mafia post I guess. Here are more of my useless opinions and stuff:
>Gekki seems too on Rainy for having a sedimentary playstyle and I don't like how he's so sure on the first day.
>I mean we have to lynch somebody from what I just was told, so I guess this is going somewhere for not having any real solid evidence
>I have no idea what Rainy looks like when he's being "scum", but Rainy doesn't look like he's doing any harm
*insert quote from where Scattered votes for me. My quotes don't work on mobile so this should do*
>You make a good point, thanks for showing me why we should vote first day
>I'm still learning
>I'm leaning towards Gekki for my vote because he seems too "into it"
>I'm sure better people to vote for will stand out eventually
Sorry I'm being a bit idle, I'm just reading and learning how we do stuff here
>Gekki seems too on Rainy for having a sedimentary playstyle and I don't like how he's so sure on the first day.
>I mean we have to lynch somebody from what I just was told, so I guess this is going somewhere for not having any real solid evidence
>I have no idea what Rainy looks like when he's being "scum", but Rainy doesn't look like he's doing any harm
*insert quote from where Scattered votes for me. My quotes don't work on mobile so this should do*
>You make a good point, thanks for showing me why we should vote first day
>I'm still learning
>I'm leaning towards Gekki for my vote because he seems too "into it"
>I'm sure better people to vote for will stand out eventually
Sorry I'm being a bit idle, I'm just reading and learning how we do stuff here
I'm only "on" rainy because he seems scummy and I'm not "so sure" that rainy is scum. I brought up cases on two other people (NP and you), but they haven't been saying anything (and tbh this new post of yours seems much more townie), and I have better reasons to vote rainy then I do to vote them. Rainy IS doing harm for being so sedentary and if he is town, he should realise that this supposed " town meta" of his isn't helping town in any way. I can see why you think I'm too "into it", but I'm sick, it's Sunday, and I don't really have anything better to do. :xIt was a stupid post :/. I mean they're right, I see now that we should vote first day. Well gg for my first mafia post I guess. Here are more of my useless opinions and stuff:
>Gekki seems too on Rainy for having a sedimentary playstyle and I don't like how he's so sure on the first day.
>I mean we have to lynch somebody from what I just was told, so I guess this is going somewhere for not having any real solid evidence
>I have no idea what Rainy looks like when he's being "scum", but Rainy doesn't look like he's doing any harm
*insert quote from where Scattered votes for me. My quotes don't work on mobile so this should do*
>You make a good point, thanks for showing me why we should vote first day
>I'm still learning
>I'm leaning towards Gekki for my vote because he seems too "into it"
>I'm sure better people to vote for will stand out eventually
Sorry I'm being a bit idle, I'm just reading and learning how we do stuff here
Otherwise, I agree with what Neurowolf said in this post and it reads townie to me.
Sure, gimme a sec to type it up
I have a lead on rainy, but i think in order to understand it, you have to read through this wall of posts. Sorry about that :/
@Celever doesn't this make ya miss Camo?
Also, as another note: Calm down with the "Hey XXX you're lurking anything to add?". As was the case with scattered here, it takes a while to read through the thread whilst keeping all the cases (good and otherwise) straight in your head. It doesn't accomplish anything, as most of the time it isn't genuine lurking but rather reading and formulating an opinion on everything that's happened since one's last post––and even when it is, lurking is punished at the discretion of the host.
What it is, on the other hand, is a very good way for scum to appear as though they're doing something beneficial when they're really not. Sort of the same as posting "!time" and nothing else in Discord WW.
##UNVOTE
##VOTE: GEKKISAIDINAI for being hyperconscious of how he appears to the town, for pseudo-tunneling a bad case, and for a whole mess of fluff designed to gain towncred.
Nono, because you were taking points against you absurdly seriously considering how early in D1 it was. It's scummy to be hyperconscious of how you appear to the town, because a true townie has nothing to hide.
Right-o.
His defense is truthful––I see this as a townie point. Defenses aren't obliged to suit your wishes.
Based off what evidence? Would be great if you could back this up with examples of rainy's townmeta and scummeta.
Not nearly as badly as you did to this.
No he isn't and you know it. He's underreacting if anything; that's your entire case on him; that he can't provide the sort of defense you're looking for.
It's a bad case. ^.^
Also, as another note: Calm down with the "Hey XXX you're lurking anything to add?". As was the case with scattered here, it takes a while to read through the thread whilst keeping all the cases (good and otherwise) straight in your head. It doesn't accomplish anything, as most of the time it isn't genuine lurking but rather reading and formulating an opinion on everything that's happened since one's last post––and even when it is, lurking is punished at the discretion of the host.
What it is, on the other hand, is a very good way for scum to appear as though they're doing something beneficial when they're really not. Sort of the same as posting "!time" and nothing else in Discord WW.
##UNVOTE
##VOTE: GEKKISAIDINAI for being hyperconscious of how he appears to the town, for pseudo-tunneling a bad case, and for a whole mess of fluff designed to gain towncred.
I don't think investigating a possible lead is "pseudo tunneling". What do you mean by fluff? I was investigating what seemed to be a legitimate lead on rainy (at least, seemed legit to me) and it turned out to be meh. After reading through rainy's posts again, they seem more like those of a confused townie than a pressured scum, so I'll ##UNVOTE: rainyman123 and ##VOTE: NinjaPenguin for voting Neurowolf supposedly to get him to talk, then not taking his vote off Neurowolf after he did. Also, for the reasons I list here:@Celever doesn't this make ya miss Camo?
Nono, because you were taking points against you absurdly seriously considering how early in D1 it was. It's scummy to be hyperconscious of how you appear to the town, because a true townie has nothing to hide.
Right-o.
His defense is truthful––I see this as a townie point. Defenses aren't obliged to suit your wishes.
Based off what evidence? Would be great if you could back this up with examples of rainy's townmeta and scummeta.
Not nearly as badly as you did to this.
No he isn't and you know it. He's underreacting if anything; that's your entire case on him; that he can't provide the sort of defense you're looking for.
It's a bad case. ^.^
Also, as another note: Calm down with the "Hey XXX you're lurking anything to add?". As was the case with scattered here, it takes a while to read through the thread whilst keeping all the cases (good and otherwise) straight in your head. It doesn't accomplish anything, as most of the time it isn't genuine lurking but rather reading and formulating an opinion on everything that's happened since one's last post––and even when it is, lurking is punished at the discretion of the host.
What it is, on the other hand, is a very good way for scum to appear as though they're doing something beneficial when they're really not. Sort of the same as posting "!time" and nothing else in Discord WW.
##UNVOTE
##VOTE: GEKKISAIDINAI for being hyperconscious of how he appears to the town, for pseudo-tunneling a bad case, and for a whole mess of fluff designed to gain towncred.
He defended. You wouldn't accept his defense. You were at it for like three pages. That's tunneling. "Pseudo" because you made passing references to other cases whenever you were called on it.
The "hey y'all I see you stop lurking" bit.
Fortunately we've got one.I think I need a dictionary for all these WW terms
Thanks, it was a nice read!He defended. You wouldn't accept his defense. You were at it for like three pages. That's tunneling. "Pseudo" because you made passing references to other cases whenever you were called on it.
The "hey y'all I see you stop lurking" bit.
Fortunately we've got one.
after reading through Gekki's case on Rainy, I can definitely see a difference. I don't know if I've ever played with scum Rainy before, so I don't know what his scum play style is. I have played several games with town Rainy though, and in previous games town Rainy doesn't really defend himself and kinda avoids things. At least that's how I recall. I've never seen Rainy act so aggressive in a game before, unless I'm missing something. I don't really think it's much to go off of currently, I'm going to look into his posts more tomorrow when I have time.
May I hear more about the NP case? Like I said earlier, I don't have enough time to read back tonight and would like to figure out more of whats going on now rather than waiting until tomorrow and getting confuzzled
Fair point. I just saw scummy behaviour and went for it since we didn't seem to be going anywhere.He defended. You wouldn't accept his defense. You were at it for like three pages. That's tunneling. "Pseudo" because you made passing references to other cases whenever you were called on it.
The "hey y'all I see you stop lurking" bit.
Fortunately we've got one.
I pretty much said the entire case on NP in my post; that's all there is to go off of.after reading through Gekki's case on Rainy, I can definitely see a difference. I don't know if I've ever played with scum Rainy before, so I don't know what his scum play style is. I have played several games with town Rainy though, and in previous games town Rainy doesn't really defend himself and kinda avoids things. At least that's how I recall. I've never seen Rainy act so aggressive in a game before, unless I'm missing something. I don't really think it's much to go off of currently, I'm going to look into his posts more tomorrow when I have time.
May I hear more about the NP case? Like I said earlier, I don't have enough time to read back tonight and would like to figure out more of whats going on now rather than waiting until tomorrow and getting confuzzled
Okay. ty
I asked them to stop lurking because I wanted other people's opinions on my case, but I can see how it looks fluffy. However, if you want to talk fluff, let's take a look at NP:He defended. You wouldn't accept his defense. You were at it for like three pages. That's tunneling. "Pseudo" because you made passing references to other cases whenever you were called on it.
The "hey y'all I see you stop lurking" bit.
Fortunately we've got one.
Cel explained why this is stupid in this post:
Which causes NP to push his point for one single post:
Then, once again, Celever explains why this is illogical:
And then NP starts to backpedal and jumps ship to vote for Neurowolf for no good reason (supposedly getting him to talk):
And then he starts distracting the discussion a little bit by asking Neuro this (even though he should read some of the old Neurowolf, Here's his next post:
So, he starts with a sentence that diverts the conversation, once again. Then, all he does is echo Lorde and give a crap reason for voting for Neurowolf. This is pure fluff.
Hooray! A real post! This is the first of two posts where he actually does something. No issues here that I can see.
The second real post he's made. Not much to say here either.
We then see a strangely NP-less page (odd considering how vocal he has been in previous games where he was town), and then we get more fluff that does kinda help Neuro but doesn't really advance the game state for town. He could be trying to appear helpful to gain towncred.
And there's the last thing he's said so far.
- Status