Actually my Charizard and Volcanians have done rediculously well. The only reason I want more opinions is because I dont know what else is really out there. Love the deck i have built but I really want to try something with Marshadow or maybe gardevoir or something similar.
If it does well at all, that's ridiculous. Think of how many people play this game. Think of how many love Charizard and
try to make it work every time it gets a new card. If you're doing well locally, that says more about your level of competition than your own skill. Yes, it is possible you've discovered some rogue deck we all somehow missed, but it is a
lot more likely you're a big fish in a small pond.
Which matters to the discussion because, until you're able to acknowledge this to yourself, it'll trip you up. I'm
still too arrogant about my standing in this game, but I'm a lot better than I was. Admitting I wasn't this genius rogue deck building but acknowledging I had done well at a small, local League because it was a small, local League and some of the kids I'd been mentoring in the game were quickly surpassing me
because I thought I knew more than I did was a hard lesson, but I'm a better player (and advice giver) now because of it.
You've been given solid advice about securing Trainer cards that will be used in most decks, and an example of a Pokémon (Zoroark-GX) likely to remain a key part of many decks.
Oh... and remember to fully identify cards. Though it is pretty obvious you're talking Gardevoir-GX (for example), I don't know if you want to mess with people's hands using the Marshadow from Shining Legends or take them on using Marshadow-GX. Why isn't it obvious? There really aren't "Marshadow" decks because neither of those cards are deck stars. They go into a deck built around something else.