RE: Competitive Discussion of the Week 7
I can see the appeal of accurate moves. It's nice to have something that's dependable, hitting just about every time you use it. However, in competitive play, the better move to go with can be the one that's less accurate.
Suppose that you want to give a pokemon a water type move to cover a certain threat. In this theoretical scenario, you have a choice between:
Surf | 90 Att. | 100 Acc. |
Hydro Pump | 110 Att. | 80 Acc. |
At first, it would seem that Surf is much more attractive. Hydro Pump misses, on average, once every fifth time it is used. For only a 20 attack power trade off, you have a move that hits just about every time you use it.
However, the idea isn't to put a water move on something just so it has a water move. If that water move doesn't reliably result in a KO on the theoretical threat, it might not be the right choice. Suppose that, using a damage calculator, it's determined that Surf only has a 65% chance of OHKOing the target. On the other hand, Hydro Pump, if successful, would OHKO the target 80% of the time by virtue of it's accuracy. It would seem that Hydro Pump would be the better choice.
Of course, Hydro Pump does miss. If that happens, the opponent remains at full HP. What then? The opponents pokemon remains at full HP, and they aren't going to be surprised by Hydro Pump anymore. There may even be times in which it fails to go off twice in a row, and it might even result in someone winning the match that shouldn't have. Hax happens.
Whether a move is more practical because it's accurate or more consistently gets a OHKO is something to be determined on a case by case basis during teambuilding. As much as I don't like when moves miss, there are times when a stronger, less accurate move is the more practical choice.