Are you talking about the part that I went over above? Cause I don't really consider that scumhunting. It's hard to appreciate the good when it's surrounded by bad.
I was talking about that, yes. Though now I've read you and Camo's commentary, I'm having many second thoughts about the scumhunting.
But ... why did you pressure me when I hadn't been online to respond to PP's post yet? At the risk of sounding OMGUS-y, are you quite sure that's not a bandwagon, bb?
Because the worst thing is if you come online, post, ignore PP's post and then don't surface until another 12 hours or so. Voting adds pressure to make you know that this lynch is a real possibility. In fact, calling me out for bandwagon simply because I voted you is veeeeery interesting.
No, it's just fluff that clogs up the thread
*like*
Seriously, it's not an issue if unless people spam the thread, and if they're going around *like*ing and not posting any other content, it's a scumtell. This rule is unnecessary and takes away a method of basing reads on, so please remove the rule. (It's not the hosts job to control the amount of "fluff" being posted...)
Also because it's day 1 my only guess is bbninjas because of what celever said, but I don't want to just go off of one of the first main PokéBeach WW players' posts before I vote.
Big [future reference] here.
No it's not. bb is hiding something.
@bbninjas, don't hide stuff. Fine, if you weren't so lazy about your future reference posts I wouldn't have been able to call you out on it. You've made that mistake now, so you have to answer for it. In the other game all of your future reference posts were clear and apparently from a town's perspective. If I'd asked you why you tagged any of those posts, you would have been able to answer me. You have no reason not to be able to answer me unless you're scum and hiding something, so that's why my vote remains on you.
There's so many good reasons why bb wouldn't want to tell you and you just pretend like they don't exist.
bbninjas made about 30 future references in the other game in which he used the system. For that post to be one of them there must be good reasoning, and that is reasoning he should share with the town. I've never seen a role be affected by actual time frames before because obviously that wouldn't work with different time zones. The post's content can't be associated with a role. Future references were also exclusively made in conjunction with reads the last time bb used the technique.
We don't need to know everyone's thoughts at all times. That helps scum more than it helps town.
Celever, do you go around posting a full list of your reads? Does Camo go around posting a full list of his reads? Do I go around posting a full list of my reads? Of course not. And I'm not telling you why I marked that post for the
same reason.
You also need to stop trying to understand why I mark what I mark, because it appears you getting it wrong. Why have you made the presumption that I found that post scummy? Perhaps I found that post
towny and simply wanted to remember it! Perhaps I noticed something that could be relevant for the future. Perhaps my role relates to it. Perhaps I did actually find that post scummy.
While Robin's new, this reads to me by dumbtelling (even if you couldn't find it in Jabber's posts you could read other people's posts to find it.)
Gut feelings can help as long as you have proveable evidence to back up your gut feeling.
You claimed super early, though what I've noticed is that you said trust me *wolfs* instead of trust me (whatever the town is called this game). That either means your role is a bomb or you actually just slipped hard.
This is funny because you provided a lead on yourself.
This seems like massive AtE to me. I know you're new, but I'm sure there's something up.
##UNOMGUS: Camo
##PICHUPOCALYPSE: Robin
This reads a lot like scum TGK trying to hunt to me. He's just spouting out common tells and saying "there, this player is complying with tells and thus should be lynched". He's also doing massive echoing iirc.
.
