I thought we were not voting anyone until we all discussed who to lynch, that's the only reason I haven't voted you yet...
Well, my vote won't go on myself. I've no one else to vote assuming the game isn't over already.
I agree with all you are saying, but changing my name with yours and viceversa.
That's what I don't like.
My Ability has been proven a lot but that's not indicative of my alignment. But yay, a few players thought that me saying "poison" was a direct scumtell! [/sarcasm]
You haven't proved anything. In fact, the days we mislynched town people, you happily joined the wagon.
Literally speaking, only twice. Considering, of course, that Goomy was anti-town with all his gibberish. But tell me: haven't you?
Actually, let's look at both of us' final votes:
D1: Luis -> Pika (S), FAP -> Goomy (T). Tyler Lynched.
D2: Luis -> Goomy (T), FAP -> No vote. Goomy Lynched.
D3: Luis -> A_P (T), FAP -> No vote. A_P Lynched.
D4: Luis -> Simsands (S, 1352), Mariano -> Simsands (S, 1374) Sim Lynched.
D5: Luis -> Drac (S, 1682[+Unvote Sam]), Mariano -> Samwise (T, 1699). Sam Lynched.
D6: Luis -> Drac (S, 1753), Mariano -> Drac (S, 1789). Drac Lynched.
D7: Luis -> Pika (S, 1815) , Mariano -> Pika (S, 1809). Pika Lynched.
D8: Luis -> Dash (T, 1883), Mariano -> Dash (T, 1881). Dash Lynched.
S= Scum Flip, T= Town Flip, numbers are the post numbers, when relevant.
You'll have to deal with FAP's votes. There's no other way, it's "you" one way or another.
D1: Since Day 1 I stated I had a hunch on Pika. And eventually it turned out to be scum. FAP, in the end, voted for Goomy. There's your first town vote.
D2: I voted for Goomy for the reasons I stated A LOT on both him and triplemo: his anti-town behavior. And I'd do it again if I had. Unlike you, that casted no vote at all.
D3: A_P might have been my "wagon" vote you're hastily talking about, and of course I made a mistake. But also did the rest of the town players that voted for him. When you, like the day before, didn't cast a vote.
D4: We both voted for Simsands. However, my vote came at least a page before yours, and you only voted for him in the last instances because let's face it: you had no other choice.
D5: I first went towards Sam, but eventually I unvoted him and went for Drac instead. A scum. In the other hand, your final vote was actually on Sam, a townie.
If I was scum, why would I change my vote to one of my partners? And not only that, but also give away all of the Soul Dew's hints towards him? If they were forged or fake, we would have gotten a message already, warning that I framed him for townie points, but of course that didn't happen.
D6: Same case as Simsands. My vote was extremely early in comparison to yours. 36 posts apart, to be precise. You voted for Drac because the Soul Dew's hints were all against him and defending him would have been obvious.
D7: My vote on Pika was 6 posts later than yours... which was the first vote? Your only shot at winning was lynching Pika so you went ahead and threw him under the bus.
D8: We both voted for Dash, and my vote was also later than yours. And ohhh, look: another townie vote from you!
Talking raw numbers, we both "Lynched" 3 towns.
But considering:
a) one of my votes was pro-town by lynching Goomy
b) You didn't contribute with a vote on 2 straight days
Those 2 points shift the case towards you.
And this post is not really a case against you. But if you're going to point fingers at me then at the very least make sure your other hand is clean.
Unfortunately I don't think I'll have time to build a full case on Luis in these 48 hours (will try though)
Please do, I beg you.
Find something relevant about me.
Besides the voting patterns of course. And don't bother including the "poison" fiasco; I already said I'm done talking about it (and don't forget Yog was who first brought it up, so... >.>)
.