So, you still think that rainyman should be lynched?
I'm still waiting for a response from @Lord o da rings to this...
So, you still think that rainyman should be lynched?
Seconding this.I'm still waiting for a response from @Lord o da rings to this...
Well, I'm just guessing at this point. I may change I may not. I don't really know yet.I'm still waiting for a response from @Lord o da rings to this...
Why do you still think he's scum?Well, I'm just guessing at this point. I may change I may not. I don't really know yet.
Do you know what lurking is Blakers?No, I've already stated all of my opinions thus far. But I'm not the only person lurking. Why me specifically?
Just going down the line, and the fact that you seem to only formulate thoughts when asked to so far.No, I've already stated all of my opinions thus far. But I'm not the only person lurking. Why me specifically?
Oh dear, those were dark times long, long ago......I remember years ago when we didn't play with RVS and we just waited for people to "mess up" day 1 and lynch them for it. Those were dark times.
Apologies, I just don't really have anything to contribute yknow? If I had something to say I'd say it. Neutral ATM but maaaybe FOS thegrovylekid for chasing Blakers a bit excessively for D1?FOS here on SF because of his post here, which really doesn't make any contribution aside from letting Blaker know that the thread is talking about him. His next post was contributing a bit, but it was still focusing on rainyman. Those are both scummy.
What is it and why are you doing it, as you implied here?Yes, I do.
Apologies, I just don't really have anything to contribute yknow? If I had something to say I'd say it. Neutral ATM but maaaybe FOS thegrovylekid for chasing Blakers a bit excessively for D1?
What is it and why are you doing it, as you implied here?
There has definitely been enough posts to contribute something, if not just a simple opinion.
Welp, you heard the man. Let's not have any discussion about who's scum and who's not, at least until everyone has been given time to come up with a defense!
He's new, I'm trying to get a feel for how he plays and/or reacts.Oh dear, those were dark times long, long ago...
Apologies, I just don't really have anything to contribute yknow? If I had something to say I'd say it. Neutral ATM but maaaybe FOS thegrovylekid for chasing Blakers a bit excessively for D1?
I'm pretty sure he didn't read the OP given he had no idea how many votes he could make.This may have been pointed out, but Rainy, if you really read the rules, you would've known not to edit...
I wanted you to answer it so that I could determine whether your definition of "lurking" is the same as the norm (which it is), so that I can get a read from your recent post that effectively admitted to lurking. Hence why I also asked for a why.Not really sure why I have to answer this, but it's reading all the posts without contributing yourself. And I was doing it because it had started to be more active, so I was doing that while simultaneously doing things on other forums.
This may have been pointed out, but Rainy, if you really read the rules, you would've known not to edit.../quote]
Quite a few new players end up editing in their first game. Either because they think they can get away with it, or because they just missed it in the rules altogether.
##UNVOTE ##VOTE: Jesi This is scummy. Jesi is sitting between the fence, probably trying to play it safe and scout out what the town thinks, before deciding whether or not to jump on a wagon. The "I'm not too sure" part is fine, but the bolded is scummy.Also, I'm not too sure where I stand with the tagging situation. I think it's a little suspicious, but I don't really know whether to pursue it just yet or not.
TGK could have just used the scumchat, if this was the case.This TGK-Blakers thing is interesting. If one of them flips scum, I could see this being TGK wanting his scum buddy to contribute.