All the evidence do be in that update for ye to draw reasonable conclusions. ^.^
Finished Mafia XL: Age of Piracy: Game Over!
- Thread starter Jabberwock
- Start date
- Status
I don't have any abilities that target players, and I didn't have any items to pass, so I wouldn't know.
@NinjaPenguin I didn't receive any PMs last night, are you sure it redirected to me?
I can confirm that I came into possession of the eyeball.
Why are you ignoring all the posts about you? Here are just some of the posts you did not bother giving an answer to:
Also, this post, together with your last post in which you only voted morda without giving any further input, imply that you are trying to watch carefully what you're saying. Keeping minimal posts and words so to give less info for the town, and less potential to flip something.
Check again. Are you sure you received no "PM"s?
Also, stop bandwagoning. We have plenty of time to decide the lynch.
@Little Cherrim Can you respond to points directed to you (especially those that tagged you)? Not replying is very scummy, and will hurt discussion.
@Little Cherrim Can you respond to points directed to you (especially those that tagged you)? Not replying is very scummy, and will hurt discussion.
Lol, those are some good instincts from the doc. Good job!
Moving on:
Also stop voting LC please, we don't want another (accidental) hammer.
Moving on:
I /think/ Fiddler's Green is that place where the ship sails and SPOILERS AHEAD Elizabeth finds her father (dead) in a row boat. Talking to the dead may be a cool, odd mechanic there.
I could see this being the effect, since Tortuga is a place where the pirates have quite a lot to drink so that may affect their senses.
Also stop voting LC please, we don't want another (accidental) hammer.
Vracken
Just a Ghost of the Past
I haven't really been able to catch up sorry, I didn't realize that I had been brought in until late in the night and I have been too busy to not really catch up to the depth I would like. Smaller notes I have on people are mostly things people have commented on so far, but forgive false reads for the moment until I can put some time into really looking into things after my tests on Thursday.
ninja Penguin #85 Wants to withhold information. I would say that is a kind of legit reason, though usually I wouldn't be upset at poitning it out, just at that I would wait to see who points it out and mark them down instead. Going on a spiel about it just seems strange to me. Reasoning for vote swapping is also weak, though possibly still RVS
Cypher #86 I agree with whoever said it was defensive (scattered?) it also felt somewhat defensive to me. Definitely strange at the very least
KoN #106 Calling it now, Keeper is foreshadowing that he is scum
lorde #116 Stuff about blakers is a little all over the place, reads weirdly to me. Otherwise hunts mord which is fine
double o #120 I disagree about the not coming up on anyone elses scumdar thing. Sometimes other people miss what you see, or you could see something that isn't there. Really depends on a lot of what is going on. So early into the game, I don't see that explanation as anything other than uneeded, but it isn't harmful in anyway, just something note worthy to me
cherrim #132 Interesting speculation. From what I have been told in past games, baseless speculation isn’t well received by some people, I got somewhat chewed out for a similar reason, so I am not 100% sure what I should be thinking about in that regard
scattered #138 I agree with the sentiment, but I am 100% pro lynching someone inactive over someone who maybe is scum, but doesn't really have any evidence on them. I don't think you are scum atm but this could could easily be read as you protecting one of the inactive players who may be scum
ninja Penguin #140 I have my eye on you for saying that, it is a weird thing to me for you to point out, not sure how I feel about it yet
Cherrim #148 Rash defense. I have no evidence on this, but I would have though scum are the ones comfortable with early claims due to having a safe claim. Though that is more dependent on the hosts and how similar they make the safe claim to the role
KoN #159 I am shaky on this. By this logic should no one share any information as it is always given freely at first?
that is all I have for now, sorry I will do my best to catch up, but I also gotta study
ninja Penguin #85 Wants to withhold information. I would say that is a kind of legit reason, though usually I wouldn't be upset at poitning it out, just at that I would wait to see who points it out and mark them down instead. Going on a spiel about it just seems strange to me. Reasoning for vote swapping is also weak, though possibly still RVS
Cypher #86 I agree with whoever said it was defensive (scattered?) it also felt somewhat defensive to me. Definitely strange at the very least
KoN #106 Calling it now, Keeper is foreshadowing that he is scum
lorde #116 Stuff about blakers is a little all over the place, reads weirdly to me. Otherwise hunts mord which is fine
double o #120 I disagree about the not coming up on anyone elses scumdar thing. Sometimes other people miss what you see, or you could see something that isn't there. Really depends on a lot of what is going on. So early into the game, I don't see that explanation as anything other than uneeded, but it isn't harmful in anyway, just something note worthy to me
cherrim #132 Interesting speculation. From what I have been told in past games, baseless speculation isn’t well received by some people, I got somewhat chewed out for a similar reason, so I am not 100% sure what I should be thinking about in that regard
scattered #138 I agree with the sentiment, but I am 100% pro lynching someone inactive over someone who maybe is scum, but doesn't really have any evidence on them. I don't think you are scum atm but this could could easily be read as you protecting one of the inactive players who may be scum
ninja Penguin #140 I have my eye on you for saying that, it is a weird thing to me for you to point out, not sure how I feel about it yet
Cherrim #148 Rash defense. I have no evidence on this, but I would have though scum are the ones comfortable with early claims due to having a safe claim. Though that is more dependent on the hosts and how similar they make the safe claim to the role
KoN #159 I am shaky on this. By this logic should no one share any information as it is always given freely at first?
that is all I have for now, sorry I will do my best to catch up, but I also gotta study
This is almost definitely the case. Take a look at this:
And as for LC, I agree that we should slow up on those votes and let him answer. He should know that he has to step up his game, because he's the primary lynch candidate.
This is about as bandwagon as you can possibly get. You basically repeated everything NP said, and jumped on a voting bandwagon, so minor FoS (Finger of Suspicion) here, but I'll attribute it to newness.
No? I even say it there. There's a good time to be sharing information, and then by that logic there must also be a bad time. Claiming is a last resort and always should be.
@GM DracLord be subbing in for @TheSceptileMaster effective immediately.
Yes, NP, I can see your giant flashing neon sign.
Alo, looks like my catch up game would be less this time around
-Agreed
-Agreed
-His vote weight was 0 yesterday, so if he was scum he could use that to his advantage bc late game people won't see him voting morda so they'll automatically give him townie points bc no one bothered to check. Just saying.
Also, whoever was saved, would you please come forward with your thoughts and reads on everyone? (Ok maybe not everyone, but you get the point.) This is probably your last day alive, and I can only assume you were on the right track or the scum team wanted to frame someone so your reads are definitely important.
Wow. Doctor got lucky. I *think* this means that since SM was attacked, he's confirmed innocent, but I'm really not sure.
I'd like some clarification on what was going on here. I might've just missed something, but these don't seem right to me.
- Status