Colorless?

[Zora]

As we all know, colorless is supposed to be Normal, Dragon, etc. So the card is white.

Anyone who's taken a basic physics course knows that black is the result of no color, not white. White is the result of all colors together.

Thoughts? Comments?

 

[jade89]

yeah i have one BBIIGGGG comment: what would they do for darkness?? huh?answer that question for me please.

 

[GHJamesGH]

As we all know, colorless is supposed to be Normal, Dragon, etc. So the card is white.

Anyone who's taken a basic physics course knows that black is the result of no color, not white. White is the result of all colors together.

Thoughts? Comments?

Isn't that backwards? I thought black was all the colors together.?

 

[SplitHeavens]

In physics, it's what your eye perceives.
In art, it's the opposite. In which black is actually accepted as a color regardless of what some believe.

Physics have no relevance to the color of types and energies.
They're Normal types. Plain, normal, no attribute.

 

[GHJamesGH]

Well maybe they're talking about colors.

 

[StealthAngel667]

Colorless to me would be transparant. Mostly, you draw on a white background. So I say white is a fine color.
Anyway, they kinda messed up all this by making energyless attacks "transparant" for more confusion and failure.

 

[GHJamesGH]

Also, what does this have to do with pokemon cards at all?

 

[dmaster]

Yeah, really. Colors and common sense do not go together in the TCG.

*Locked*

dmaster out.