Accurate card grading?

R

richiel1991

Schoolboy Richie
Member
Do you think I am accurately grading my cards?

It's the same cliche story you've all heard before, I've found my old pokemon cards and looking to sell them as a lot. 5 complete sets and right around 3,000 cards. I've been taking my time though and trying to individually grade as many cards as possible. As far as Holos go I have my two base sets uploaded. What do you all think? I consider most to be excellent-near mint. Gonna be uploading the other sets sometime the end of this week as well! *Oh yeah i posted a graystamped nidoking too (;

http://imgur.com/a/K6Uzm
 
The extra money you'd get by getting those graded is probably less than the money it would cost to grade them.
 
I'm not getting them graded by PSA. I was just asking if my grading seems accurate. That way when I sell them as a lot I can accurately list the lot as either most being EX-NM or NM-MT. Seems like a lot of people just randomly say their cards are NM-MT when in fact there is wear on them
 
Riraito said:
I'd go with EX-NM for these. Some are pretty damaged, but some are almost NM.
Click to expand...

Agreed. But make sure to show off the good condition on notables like Charizard. :)
 
richiel1991 said:
I'm not getting them graded by PSA. I was just asking if my grading seems accurate. That way when I sell them as a lot I can accurately list the lot as either most being EX-NM or NM-MT. Seems like a lot of people just randomly say their cards are NM-MT when in fact there is wear on them
Click to expand...

It could be better to list individually. They appear to be 3rd printing. http://www.pokebeach.com/forums/thread-index-of-guides-for-collectors?pid=2233071#pid2233071
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top