No, it provides a single unit of energy that is every type simultaneously. TPCi has stated that repeatedly, but this particular ruling makes it very clear:Sorry you are so wrong. Please read the card before calling someone wrong.
View attachment 19032
"It provides every type of Energy, but provides only 1 energy at a time"
This means luminous energy + fighting energy is essentially fighting energy + fighting energy to satisfy the cost as it cannot provide 2 energy types at the same time. Thus, you will need fighting + fighting + luminous energy.
TPCi said:Q. If I use Tinkaton's "Alloyed Hammer" attack with only one Luminous Energy attached, does it do 60 or 180 damage?
A. The Luminous Energy pays the {P} attack cost but also counts as all energy types including {M}, so you would do the bonus damage for a total of 180 damage.
No because okigi needs 2 fighting energies and luminous only provides one energy at a timeDoes luminous energy work the way I think it does here? Would Okidogi hit for 170 with a basic fighting and a luminous energy attached?
Luminous Energy counts as 1 Energy but provides every type of Energy. As has already been stated, the official ruling is that Luminous would count as Fighting and Darkness simultaneously.No because okigi needs 2 fighting energies and luminous only provides one energy at a time
No, it provides a single unit of energy that is every type simultaneously. TPCi has stated that repeatedly, but this particular ruling makes it very clear:
It's not an evolution Pokemon.Okidogi will have a gnarly presence in GLC, slap a reversal on that bad boy and reverse sweep.
30 damage buff is actually really good, especially with an alternate use. Damage mod is so important in this metaOkidogi will have a gnarly presence in GLC, slap a reversal on that bad boy and reverse sweep. Kieran isn't good, let alone great, same with his sister. But grass is getting support so Torterra is really making a statement to be a deck to be reckoned with.
I stand corrected it would state "1 energy card type" if what I said was true. Its essentially 1 rainbow energy. So you need 1 luminous energy (provides both dark and fighting) 1 fighting energy.No, it provides a single unit of energy that is every type simultaneously. TPCi has stated that repeatedly, but this particular ruling makes it very clear:
You've got it! ?I stand corrected it would state "1 energy card type" if what I said was true. Its essentially 1 rainbow energy. So you need 1 luminous energy (provides both dark and fighting) 1 fighting energy.
It has the exact same wording and effect while attached as Rainbow Energy (other than the limitation obviously), so yes.I stand corrected it would state "1 energy card type" if what I said was true. Its essentially 1 rainbow energy. So you need 1 luminous energy (provides both dark and fighting) 1 fighting energy.
But I mean, we must admit that they really fcked up when they added 'at a time' to the card text, when it never used to have an impact to the tcg before. It should write '.. but only provides 1 energy.' Then there would be no such confusion. ???I stand corrected it would state "1 energy card type" if what I said was true. Its essentially 1 rainbow energy. So you need 1 luminous energy (provides both dark and fighting) 1 fighting energy.