I've seen way too many signatures with 1 or 2 PB scans, one of those scans has the length of an average post, so I have to scroll down 2 posts to see the next posts, and for what? why would you need to put scans in your signature?, we probably know about the card, a tiny image of the card would be a lot more pleasant, maybe even only the image, a signature can be useful for recognition, but please, don't make your signature needlessly long.
also, some of the sig-makers here on PB make rather large sig, this is also really annoying sometimes
I also notice that my comp is working slower when a certain sig is in the screen, if you make you sig yourself, i would suggest to save it as a PNG, it is as good as a BMP, but uses almost no bytes, sometimes the different isn't really huge, but sometimes it is, for example: the blue 100x100 image in my sig: BMP: 29.3 kB PNG: 6.80kB, that's 4 times as small
just to let everyone know, if some-one agrees or disagrees with me on this, please reply
And while I'm at it, I'm also asking for a max sig length and size, thanks in advance
also, some of the sig-makers here on PB make rather large sig, this is also really annoying sometimes
I also notice that my comp is working slower when a certain sig is in the screen, if you make you sig yourself, i would suggest to save it as a PNG, it is as good as a BMP, but uses almost no bytes, sometimes the different isn't really huge, but sometimes it is, for example: the blue 100x100 image in my sig: BMP: 29.3 kB PNG: 6.80kB, that's 4 times as small
just to let everyone know, if some-one agrees or disagrees with me on this, please reply
And while I'm at it, I'm also asking for a max sig length and size, thanks in advance