The Importance of the Label "Canon" & Respect for Creators & Fandom Stories

Leaf_Ranger

Knight of Nature and Pokémon
Member
WARNING: THIS THREAD IS NOT FOR POSTING ANY FANDOM WORKS!

The title of this thread is bigger than usual and includes three aspects that are connected.

Starting with the importance of the label "canon", I want to know how does something that is regarded as canon or non-canon in a certain series affects your view of it and what would happen if it changed from being one to be the other.

Secondly, how much should the fans respect the creator, how far does it goes, when should one stop respecting, or at least not have so high regard towards it and how much, if any, should the fans opinions influence the creator's work.

The last one is if you have come up with any fandom story and why.
_________________________________________________________________________

From my three favorite game series - Castlevania, Metal Gear Solid, Pokémon -, the one I have less problems regarding all those questions is Pokémon.
There's the main series and the side ones, without some being canon and the others not, so there's nothing to worry about.
Despite having a few issues in some of the games, I don't have any problems with the creators themselves (and that is due to their "policy" of not talking too much and not speaking about what doesn't matter), just, sometimes, their work. Regarding those issues - and this goes for all the media, series, etc. -, on one hand I wished they would listen to the fans, but on the other hand I like things how they are - the creators deciding almost alone and at the end, I'll go with the second because «what makes a fan?», «should "bigger" fans have more relevance?», and «how does one measure the "size" of a fan?» are questions that don't have just one answer, but many and will lead to petty wars.
My nickname comes from one idea for a fandom work but it didn't came out as disappointment towards how things are in the Pokémon games' universe, but as a wish to focus on a story and to revisit a region that will only come back to life as a remake.

About Castlevania, a few years ago, Koji Igarashi decided to clean the in-game chronology, as games that were considered canon (and weren't produced by him) were no more, in order to have freedom to create new games and in one case because the protagonist was a female, and he felt that that would be akward for the time setting of the game (Middle Ages). I own one of the games that were decanonized and I have mixed feelings about it. The experience was already different because the story and characters were set somewhat apart from what I was used to and what I learned after searching more info about the series, namely the fact that the protagonist wasn't a member of the Belmont clan and that his whip wasn't the Vampire Killer. After said decanonization, I felt relieved because it meant that a game with a Belmont or someone related to them could be set in the 19th century and one that would follow more closely the feeling and atmosphere of that age.
While no longer at Konami, I still respect Koji for what he did to the series and the emphasis he placed on the replayability of his games, despite not agreeing that much with his systems of coming up with a combat system first and only after coming up with a story and setting.
Castlevania didn't escaped my desire to come up with a fandom story but in the start it was just like Pokémon - because I wanted to have some side story to something that was already great and that fulfilled me. After Koji stopped being the producer and Konami decided to give the series a new look and make reboot, my reasons are now more of discontent with the way things were and the whole Lords of Shadow saga and Konami's intentions behind it, namely the desire from profiting by making the game more appealing to more people, making the series and games lost its identity.

Hideo Kojima. This name spurs so much discussion and opinions...This man doesn't live without retconning something. While Snake's Revenge seems indeed like trash, Portable Ops still divides the fans about its actual state of "ghost side game" that happened in the in-game chronology but not every story point is canon and it doesn't suit Kojima's plans for future games.
While his games are still fun to play, the story is so convoluted - thanks to Kojima himself - that fans have started to disregard what the man says about what's canon or not. I myself am included in those, while also not being the same fan I was some 6 years ago. Back then, I saw him as a great producer, focused on telling a story, with every game being and having the importance of a child, a product of a father. Right now, with so many come and go, ups and downs, and some ridiculous stuff being said, I just wish the best form him (accordingly to his wishes) and just play the games for fun, not caring about what's behind it. Kojima has expressed the desire for making other games than MGS and that he wants to pass the torch to younger folks but he keeps going back, still making MGS games and still producing them, first because the MGS franchise is now one of the few series that makes profit and keeps Konami afloat and secondly, because he thinks his staff is not yet ready.
I also have a fandom story set in the MGS universe, with some MGS characters but only considering certain games as canon, and it came up as a result of disappointment too.

Edit: I knew I was forgeting something. Thanks for bringing Star Wars, CMP! ;)

I don't have anything that isn't canon, but I know how others must be feeling, namely when it's a work that's good, with nice setting and characters, and seeing that being dismissed after investing time (and money) must be hard.
Right now the only respect I have for Lucas is for creating the series, nothing more. The way he jumped off the boat and what we're seeing now seems like a coward's exit, like he was tired of his own creation, which I understand but not the way the exit was made. I've read many fans started saying that they'll have their own idea of what's canon or not and again, I can relate to that, but here because I hate some of the material, like the Clone Wars animated series.
I also have come up with a fandom story but not due to the state of things in general but to the emphasis that is given to the Jedi vs Sith conflict, while sometimes forgetting other people and jobs.

At the end, one reason that is common for all my fandom stories is the lack of maturity (not nudity nor blood and violence, but more in regards to the themes and situations created) in the original/legit works.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

Interesting topic. Though I can't comment very much on the series you listed, another with topical relevance is Star Wars.

With the upcoming trilogy (Episodes VII-IX), it has been announced that these films will differ from the story lines set by the various books, comics, etc. in the Expanded Universe (EU). Because of this, some works previously considered canon will no longer be so. Fan reaction has been mixed; some argue that they've grown to care about the plethora of characters fleshed out by the EU over the past decades, while others argue that the films have truly been the only works they consider canon.

I'm of the opinion that it's completely up to the discretion of the creator(s). If it were up to fans, most aspects of different series would seem like just that -- bad fan fiction.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

If it came from an official source, it's canon. It doesn't matter if the fans "consider" or "don't consider" something they like or don't like canon. It's not your call. People who claim stupid things like "only the star wars movies are canon" or whatever are just in denial and also super butthurt.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

PMJ said:
People who claim stupid things like "only the star wars movies are canon" or whatever are just in denial and also super butthurt.

It's official; George Lucas is both super butthurt and in denial. I had always suspected this was the case, but never heard it confirmed until now. :D

---

To be honest, I don't really care about canon stories, timelines, whatever have you for the video games that I enjoy. I know a lot of people who love debating the Zelda timelines and stuff for example, but it's never really been that interesting to me, personally. Because video games have to have a lot of gameplay elements, their stories/universe/etc. always have to be taken with a certain amount of salt (usually the entire shaker). You're playing a game, so you have to have that extra layer of suspension of disbelief.

I've written a few stories within the Pokémon universe, but I do bend and twist it to fit my own needs. I understand that Pokémon trainers are only kids in order to make the game more appealing to the desired audience, so I scrap that (in "my" universe, Pokémon trainers start in their late-teens), and also make the world more realistic in terms of consequences of actions by people and Pokémon. I don't fault Pokémon for not being more realistic in their game setting, but it's just my style of writing that I would rather make it more true to life.

I guess the only really extended canon setting that I've been involved with is Star Wars. I love the EU, especially the novels, and some of the comics as well. They've built up a very interesting world and it's lots of fun to play around in. I'm looking forward to the new movies and I'd like to see what they make of them, but I'll always hold the original EU deep in my heart. But I can also hope that Jacen exists in the new EU and that he's not turned into a Sith Lord this time...
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

PMJ said:
If it came from an official source, it's canon. It doesn't matter if the fans "consider" or "don't consider" something they like or don't like canon. It's not your call. People who claim stupid things like "only the star wars movies are canon" or whatever are just in denial and also super butthurt.

I agree with you only until the last sentence. Like I've said, the creators must do what they want when it's about creating content and rearrange the series even to the point of destroying it on purpose if they want to but I disagree when you say those people are in denial and butthurt. Sometimes those people are just not accepting what may be a trainwreck and it may lead to not being fans anymore. Despite something coming from the creator or official source being canon, people don't have to accept it, they can always give up or only being fans to a certain extent.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

Yes they do. It's not a question about whether or not they like the canon material. If the creator does something to the canon that you don't like and you then claim that the change isn't canon because it damaged the established canon or just refuse to accept the new canon for the same reason, you are wrong.

Just because you don't like the changes doesn't mean they aren't canon.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

PMJ said:
Yes they do. It's not a question about whether or not they like the canon material. If the creator does something to the canon that you don't like and you then claim that the change isn't canon because it damaged the established canon or just refuse to accept the new canon for the same reason, you are wrong.

Just because you don't like the changes doesn't mean they aren't canon.

Again, not if you stop being a fan or just consider yourself less of a fan! People don't have to accept the whole thing. Like in political parties, some members don't follow everything of its less important policies but they don't stop considering themselves as Y or X (no pun intended).
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

I have to agree with PMJ's point of view here. Whether you accept it or not, if the creator says it's canon that's really all there is to it. Whether people are a fan or not is irrelevant in the case of being canon or not.

This topic made me think about Dragonball Z and Dragonball GT. Dragonball GT is considered canon (painful, but true), since the creator gave them permission to continue the story as far as I know. It was, however, not continued by the same person. How do you feel about that? Should it still be considered canon if someone else is continuing it with the permission of the original author? *Note this is not asking if it is canon, but whether you think it should be.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

If the creator gives out permission to continue a work, everything they do with it is considered canon (see: ponies seasons 2-4 and onward).
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

I realise that it is canon. I'm asking how people feel about it when they follow a story by someone which is then taken over by somebody else. I know it is still canon, since they have the permission to continue it, but how do people feel about that? I hated it for Dragonball GT, since I didn't like it. If I would like the series I wouldn't have minded.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

Drohn said:
I have to agree with PMJ's point of view here. Whether you accept it or not, if the creator says it's canon that's really all there is to it. Whether people are a fan or not is irrelevant in the case of being canon or not.

This topic made me think about Dragonball Z and Dragonball GT. Dragonball GT is considered canon (painful, but true), since the creator gave them permission to continue the story as far as I know. It was, however, not continued by the same person. How do you feel about that? Should it still be considered canon if someone else is continuing it with the permission of the original author? *Note this is not asking if it is canon, but whether you think it should be.

It should be canon. It has the creator's permission, just like how Lucas left the boat in charge of others (despite the way he did it), but that doesn't change the fact that for a fan it might still not be canon as long, like I've said, he doesn't claim to be a "true"/entire fan, just a fan of X and not a fan of Y or left being a fan of all. The fans opinion won't indeed change if something is canon or not, but they still have a saying when it comes to accept it or not. The creators do/release something so it's bound to be accepted or neglected, despite the official status given to that, to which the creator goes or makes other works go.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

What the creator makes or approves as canon is canon. Someone who doesn't like that just stops being a fan. DBZ and DBGT that Drohn mentioned are a good example (I don't know if there's anyone who liked GT more than Z anyway).
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

First, strike the word "fan" from your vocabulary; it's only muddying things up. Whether you call yourself a "fan" or not doesn't change whatever enjoyment you get from something, so speaking of yourself as a "true fan" is just belittling people who are, in your opinion, not as "fans" of something as you are, or who don't share your opinions about it; it's sadly something very common in geek circles, as is the entitlement that comes with being a "fan", which is what you're really discussing here.

As many are saying, what is canon and what is not depends entirely on the original creator, and examples were given; lauren faust becoming a consultant during the later seasons of MLP, or lucas giving his approval to filoni, or toriyama with dragon ball GT; similarly, I'd like to point out that no work is entirely the responsibility of an all-mighty creator, but rather teams of people, responsible of pieces of the whole work (in which case, saying the creator has total responsibility would be false). But here's where that pesky word "fan" comes to make a mess of things; "fans" tend to appropriate whatever thing they're a fan of; they consider that the connection they share with the object is stronger than whoever else's; that's one of the reasons stuff like rule 34 exists, for example, even though it often ends up ruining the party for everyone else.

If a creator, in his position as the more recognizable/important part of a team of people decides to listen to people's suggestions on canon or not, more power to them, but they're not really bound to anything, regardless of how the "fans" feel.
 
RE: The importance of the label "canon", the respect for the creator(s) and fandom stories

professorlight said:
First, strike the word "fan" from your vocabulary; it's only muddying things up. Whether you call yourself a "fan" or not doesn't change whatever enjoyment you get from something, so speaking of yourself as a "true fan" is just belittling people who are, in your opinion, not as "fans" of something as you are, or who don't share your opinions about it; it's sadly something very common in geek circles, as is the entitlement that comes with being a "fan", which is what you're really discussing here.

As many are saying, what is canon and what is not depends entirely on the original creator, and examples were given; lauren faust becoming a consultant during the later seasons of MLP, or lucas giving his approval to filoni, or toriyama with dragon ball GT; similarly, I'd like to point out that no work is entirely the responsibility of an all-mighty creator, but rather teams of people, responsible of pieces of the whole work (in which case, saying the creator has total responsibility would be false). But here's where that pesky word "fan" comes to make a mess of things; "fans" tend to appropriate whatever thing they're a fan of; they consider that the connection they share with the object is stronger than whoever else's; that's one of the reasons stuff like rule 34 exists, for example, even though it often ends up ruining the party for everyone else.

If a creator, in his position as the more recognizable/important part of a team of people decides to listen to people's suggestions on canon or not, more power to them, but they're not really bound to anything, regardless of how the "fans" feel.

I agree with you that the word "fan" is muddying things up though I thought that it was the distinction of what a creator calls canon and what a "fan" calls it that was doing that, so thanks for enlightning, but I'm not calling myself a "true fan" of anything. As a matter of fact I'm more of a fan of X and not Y in all examples above except Pokémon and when it comes to Pokémon, I've thought that to myself ever since watching WPM sentence under his nickname, the one that says " I like Pokémon more than you", and I've come to realise that there's a reason why Pokémon ranks 3rd place in my list of favorite series - because i just enjoy it and while liking it, if I had to chose, there were two more ahead of it. If I was a "true fan" of something, if I had the sense that my connection with something is stronger thatn others, I wouldn't say right in one of my posts that the creator(s) should should do something without the meddling of fans, not only because they're are the creators but because the definition of what a fan is and the "size" of one is something that might have a lot of different answers and criteria. Long gone are the days when I wished for the involvement of "fans" in something and everything.

I never said that what the creator (I use the singular to try focusing only one creator vs the fans, without thinking about what others co-creators bring to the table) thinks or has as canon isn't what matters, it is, what I said is that for "fans" - yes, those that not only enjoy themselves with something but might even think their connection (with the Force =P) is stronger than others -, that is not the case since they have their own idea of what's canon or not and that's where comes the question about the respect for the creator(s) in the title of this thread.
 
Back
Top