Sure, let's now use the fallacy of "it's not what they're saying, it's how they're saying". It's easy saying we're all "crazed" and "blind with senseless rage" or whatever and not having to address any of the actual points we're making. Yes, we may be furious, and we may even not be making our biggest effort to come off as "reasonable", but that means jacks*** to the actual underlying points. We have serious, legitimate and perfectly solid concerns regarding the news, we can either discuss the points, or you people can create a bubble of the enlightened who won't engage with the angry savages and never have to actually address the issues, I'm fine with that as well.
Also, some of the arguments I'm seeing from the enlighted and pure of heart are just bad and lacking logic. For instance, the "progress", the "moving forward" argument, you people are talking like that is an end in and of itself. It's not. Going forward is only as good as the destination. Anyone knows the issues the current client has, and not a single person has denied them or said the client is perfect. But we cannot throw the baby out with the bathwater. Some of your arguments is basically "the old client had problems, therefore we have to automatically accept any and whatever change comes with the new one", and that is just stupid, sorry for my bluntness, but there's no other way to put it.