Your argument is weak. Blastoise and Squirtle are both, in fact, TURTLES. Turtwig and Torterra share the similar quality of being turtles, as well as the sprout-->tree "growing up" similarity.
Alright, so then what about the other examples I listed? I was just listing a variety of starter examples some people may or may not agree with. I do not think Squirtle and Blastoise look alike nor do I think Torchic and Blaziken do. And if I remember correctly, Blaziken was thought to be a Legendary Pokemon and completely unrelated to Torchic when it was first leaked.
WPM, spare us your insider information, seriously. This insider information crud is absolutely ruining your/Serebii/Pokexperto's community, and I'm pretty sick of it. If it's real , show us the proof, and if Pokexperto wants to validate his claim, why is he keeping it secret?
Really? Spare you guys the insider information? Are you nuts? Why would I do that? While I would LOVE to show you harder proof, I simply can't or I would lose my ability to use the same sources again. This is common sense - use your head.
I also love how you discredit people's arguments by saying you have your own insider information, and then say "We'll know it's a scam if the smiley mask Pokemon has crazy eyebrows". Um, what? So, you're basing your argument of disqualifying other's arguments based on something that you yourself have not confirmed yet?
No, I was saying if you don't believe me, wait for that Pokemon to be revealed. Again, common sense.
Give us a break, tell us or shut up and let us speculate. I'm tired of this just as much as you are, but coming in and saying "Lol okay guys, they are real now" while EVERY SINGLE SOURCE has a TINGE of doubt is pretty ballsy and insulting
I did tell you. That's what my post on the front page is. And this isn't the first time the majority of the fandom has thought a Pokemon is fake or real and they turned out to be the opposite.
Also, you yourself tackle the weakest of the arguments. What about the forensic editing proof, or perhaps the errors within the sprites? The coloring issues with Pokabu's 2nd evolution, the fact that Mijumaru is all-but-confirmed Fighting-type (Revenge/Shell Blade) yet shows none of these qualities, or the fact that the final evolutions show perspective issues with the mustache of Mijumaru's 3rd and the hood of Tsutaja's 3rd.
Forensic editing proof? I deal in Photoshop all the time. If you look too closely at something you will almost always find something wrong with it. It's the same for skeptic arguments in the real world, like the moon landing being fake. If you look too closely into it, you'll almost always find something to support your argument.
You validate your argument by picking at the weakest link, when everyone agrees that they are WEAK arguments.
Everyone? Really? Your logic is that of a five year old. :/
