Search results

OP was obviously wandering what would happen if he used Turo while under the effect of Milotic's ability.

It can't be returned to your hand. Turo would just do nothing.

God these hit different... No matter how "pretty" the new ones may look, they all feel souless when compared to the old ones.

How confusing is it to someone though, unless their like...five.

Unless I'm going crazy, BW and XY frame has objectively more stuff going on, more details in various elements, etc. So unless by more "dull" you mean something completely subjective that I can't seem to grasp, I'd still maintain that XY frame is (almost objectively) superior.

A.k.a. the worst frame they've ever used. BW and XY frame is the best one.

Meh.

I get the goal of this product, and it looks like it will deliver on it, I actually think this is great. My only complaint is, why the hell wouldn't they monetize Live to begin with, if you could buy cards and trade them, it would be amazing, and they would also have the money to justify...

Of all the frames possible, they went with the worst one they ever did, the S&M one. Yikes.

19 counting the paradox versions of the Johto beasts and Unova's Swords of Justice ones.

Isn't Bloodmoon Ursaluna just an alternate form of Ursaluna? Why wouldn't it be just a stage 2 ex that evolves from Ursaring???

My god, the Bianca merch though <3

It's probably because of how simple the deck is in concept, and as they say, consistency is king. It's no wonder it survived this long.

Lay off the pipe, man.

This. Plus, until they prove otherwise, S&V made me see them as spineless cowards, the terastal mechanic was a huge let down with the whole "bench barrier instead of actually interesting ancient trait-like mechanic", so now, instead of being let down, I'll just assume that they'll translate this...

I was hoping they would've learned their lesson the first time around and fixed the obvious design flaws with the Ace Spec cards. They had a chance to make them more interesting and archetype specific effects instead of just some busted generic ones that every deck would obviously want...

I actually like this one. Turns out stock art is not a problem per se, it's the lazyness of the overall design. I for one think the stock arts work wonders with the overall result. I dig it.

Very cool article.

Yeah, I didn't bring it up on my first response up there, but I 100% can understand why competitive players like more somewhat defined metas for those reasons. In fact, I always thought that was a bit of a double-edged sword, not only for Pokémon. For instance, I kinda got tired of playing...

You're missing some nuance here. "A clear best deck" is a very different statement than "1 deck completely dominates". A deck can very clearly be the best deck, because of factors other than "it's just insanely stronger than everything else". In fact it can be just a bit better than the next...