If the question is addressed to me, my top read is Blakers.
(I'm still in a slim doubt)
That's useful! I think we pretty much knew it already, though.
I think that it might be a good idea for everyone to post their top
3 scumreads, actually. This way we can really easily see where everyone's at, and it's awesome for future reference!
My Top 3 are Blakers first, and then Lorde, and then probably Vracken. Lord is a scumread because I have no idea where his head's at, whereas I have a rough idea with everyone else. Scum oftentimes want to remain neutral so they can take whatever stance is convenient for them. Vracken is a very light scumread for a similar reason, because his posts tend to be quite wishy-washy.
Dang it, I reloaded the page and everything I wrote got deleted. Trust me, I'm not lurking.
The fact that bbninjas got lynched somewhat worries me. Day 2 was a lot of Celever and bb (the two most active and experienced players) butting heads, and bb was town, so if Celever is scum, he could have just nightkilled bb to shut him up because he's the only player that could expose him because he's better than most of us (cause we're all newbies). And now…
Celever is already pushing for a lynch a few hours into the game, which makes it really easy for new players to bandwagon on (especially since Celever basically
asked them to). Given that most of the game is comprised of new players, if Celever is scum, this could just be a way for scum to push an easy mislynch and keep the pressure off of them. And since Celever basically assured everyone that it was a good lynch, everyone is going to comply because they're new and they feel reassured that Celever, the more experienced player, knows what he's doing with the Blakers lynch.
But you're not off the hook, Blakers! >:L
Like lord o said, lynching an indie is beneficial for everyone, so this doesn't prove you're town at all.
This makes no sense…DOS's "correction" doesn't correct anything at all. It's pretty obvious here that you're faking. I don't see how you're not.
So now that you've pretty much outright lied to us…
##VOTE: Blakers
If Blakers flips town, my case on Celever still stands.
@Blakers Do you have anything to say? If not, then I'm all for making you my lynch candidate for today.
In retrospect, picking fancy text for my name was probably a bad idea. :L
"Celever is scum so I'm gonna restate the point he just made against Blakers to try and take credit for it because I secretly agree with him but think he might be scum anyway". If you think the case about the poor faking is good, credit me :U And also the focus on me saying "this is a good lynch" is distancing yourself from the lynch, so if Blakers end up flipping town I actually think that post is a good indication that
you might be mafia. Regardless, it's total speculation.
1. I quoted myself actually using the ability. I said more than just what you have linked.
I didn't see that. Regardless, it's easily fake and can also still be "I will use my ability on Little Cherrim and my nightkill on bb".
2. That's how they said it.
Are you claiming to only have one ability?
3. DoS added in "Night 2." That was the correction.
Yes, in bold. My night updates when rainy took my ability and gave it back were not in bold, and also had a colon at the end.
4. You're saying I faked the whole thing? Just based on how the hosts phrased their posts?
Partially, and also how you phrased the reveal of the posts.
5. You're a veteran player. Look at the obvious trap here. People thought I was scummy, so it's a great opportunity to frame me next day. Absolutely textbook.
So my case should be discredited because... I have more experience than everyone else? That just means I've built more cases. If you want to put mad cred into my posts just because I'm experienced that's your prerogative, but I in no way encourage this.
Wow, you're quick to agree with anything going against me. Drac, can I ask why you didn't share any of this earlier?
Because the day's just started, he's in an odd timezone and he had to type up a summary of the entire game so far? It was quite punctual, I though.
And Celever, don't you think making scumchat assumptions is a bad idea? Why don't you bring that up when he assumes it about me?
I was essentially agreeing with everything in the post besides that one line. Saying it's a "good post" and saying "I agree with these points" are different. If I only want members to say things I agree with, that's being a terrible team player. The point of mafia is bouncing off each other, not trying to only hear what you want to hear. Maybe that's the point of being mafia, hence why it's your mindset right now?
Regardless, Celever is hedging his bet solely on an assumption that I'm faking. That's not a good case.
There's a difference between an assumption and a derivation. Based on everything available to us, you faking these logs is the most logical conclusion.
And I'd be surprised if you all can't see the obvious bait here. Like Tempest said, Celever is kind of wielding his veteran status in an attempt to get me lynched by majority. That's definitely a scumtell.
Please quote where I said "I am a veteran therefore listen to me". Veteran status is a curse not a blessing; you get nightkilled early and everyone is inherently doubtful about anything you say -- point in case. It's easily exploitable by scum to try and discredit experienced players and focus their nightkills on other less experienced players who are actually talking a lot of sense. As such, I do want to go back and look at NP's reads, though I think they were predominantly anti-Prof.
By the looks of things, I'm going to have to role claim, because there's no other way to convince you all...
Build a case on someone else. If it's good, people will support you. If it's not as good as the case on you, which is probable, then sure you're probably stuck having to roleclaim xD
